From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Aug 31 10:24:09 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id KAA13958
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 10:24:09 -0700
Received: from ns1.win.net (ns1.win.net [204.215.209.3])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA13952
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 10:24:08 -0700
Received: (from bugs@localhost) by ns1.win.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA16399 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 13:30:19 -0400
From: Mark Hittinger <bugs@ns1.win.net>
Message-Id: <199508311730.NAA16399@ns1.win.net>
Subject: Re: What do you think of these patches to echo? (fwd)
To: current@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 13:30:17 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 466       
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


For what it is worth I feel that we should do anything trivial like this
to make it easy for the SCO base to try FreeBSD.

The SCO base is very large, and their Xenix installed base is probably
much larger than anyone realizes.  All of these systems will have to
be upgraded at some point in the near future.  They will probably
experiment with Linux first unless news of our support for SCO compatibility 
makes the rounds.


Regards,

Mark Hittinger
bugs@win.net