Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:04:20 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: Renato Botelho <rbgarga@gmail.com>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: problems building new clamav because of march i386 Message-ID: <201001270804.20670.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100127123422.GA30191@freebsd.org> References: <747dc8f31001270405l4fc1e79ctb892ad92db96204d@mail.gmail.com> <20100127123422.GA30191@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 27 January 2010 7:34:22 am Roman Divacky wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:05:42AM -0200, Renato Botelho wrote: > > I'm having some problem trying to update clamav-devel port to > > a new snapshot. > > > > Since it's using llvm now, i didn't build on i386 arch, after some > > changes, it builds now but without atomic build. > > > > The point is, the clamav team say since our march is i386-* the > > binaries are built for old i386 arch, is it correct? > > > > Here is the thread under clamav-devel maillist, could someone > > take a look and gimme some help to understand and maybe fix > > the problem? > > I've already talked to Edwin Torok about this... the problem is that > llvm needs atomic builtins which only i486 provides. The change > of default target from i386 to i486 has been made on HEAD and I believe > the commit was already MFCed to (at least) 8.x. > > I believe the port could be fixed by something like CFLAGS+=-march=i486 It was merged to 7 as well. It seems 6.x should use a newer gcc version for the llvm support anyway. You should probably only add -march=i486 to CFLAGS if it isn't already present. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201001270804.20670.jhb>