From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Aug 20 22:46:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc2.occa.home.com (ha1.rdc2.occa.home.com [24.2.8.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB97153DC for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 22:46:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rbettle@criterion-group.com) Received: from criterion-group.com ([24.5.44.161]) by mail.rdc2.occa.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP id <19990821054644.KUBC7447.mail.rdc2.occa.home.com@criterion-group.com> for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 22:46:44 -0700 Message-ID: <37BE3E4A.5342BE91@criterion-group.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 22:51:06 -0700 From: Roy Bettle X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Questions List FreeBSD.org" Subject: Resolving NT machine names with NAT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Good evening. We have a Cox Communications cable modem. They use the @Home Network. We would like to setup NAT so that both our machines can go out. We have tried to use Linux RedHat 6.0 but have not been able to get IPMasq to resolve the Windows NT Server host names (we use a static IP address, but the @Home Network apparently manages itself with Windows NT Server and NT DHCP). This is apparently a known problem with IPMasq. Does this problem exists with NAT as well? If so, can we get around it? If so, how (URL to help us out perhaps?)? Thank you for your help! RAB Roy Bettle President, Criterion Group http://www.criterion-group.com rbettle@criterion-group.com (949) 452-1203 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message