Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:48:31 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beat_G=E4tzi?= <beat@FreeBSD.org> To: Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r303725 - in head: deskutils/virt-manager devel/libvirt-java devel/p5-Sys-Virt net-mgmt/virt-viewer net-mgmt/virtinst net-mgmt/zenpack-libvirt sysutils/cfengine-devel sysutils/cfengine33 Message-ID: <BF999256-9439-42DE-999D-7BF7D6819F62@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120905223739.GA8950@hatter> References: <201209052148.q85LmLrD007420@svn.freebsd.org> <5047D11C.9070006@FreeBSD.org> <20120905223739.GA8950@hatter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 6, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Jason Helfman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:24:28PM -0700, Doug Barton thus spake: >> On 09/05/2012 14:48, Jason Helfman wrote: >>> Author: jgh >>> Date: Wed Sep 5 21:48:20 2012 >>> New Revision: 303725 >>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/303725 >>> >>> Log: >>> - follow r303724 shlib bump of libvirt >> >> As has been discussed before, please do these commits at the same time. >> In the theoretical future where we might need to merge them to a stable >> ports branch, it's easier to merge 1 than 2; and there are no >> circumstances where we would revert just one or the other. >> >> Doug > > I've asked this before this commit several times, and there was no general > consensus. It was also suggested that I follow the method in which I did > perform the commit. > > While I do agree with you, if this is what we should be doing, this should > be documented accordingly by portmgr. The Ports Subversion Primer already document this in the "Editing and Committing" section. Beat
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BF999256-9439-42DE-999D-7BF7D6819F62>