From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 21:10:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E1B16A404 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCDE13C465 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m1MLA4ja010734 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:10:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m1MLA4KP010733; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:10:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:10:04 GMT Message-Id: <200802222110.m1MLA4KP010733@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Volker Cc: Subject: Re: kern/73646: [ahd] I/O performance: with/without MEMIO option X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Volker List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:10:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/73646; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Volker To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, wkwu@csie.nctu.edu.tw Cc: Subject: Re: kern/73646: [ahd] I/O performance: with/without MEMIO option Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:07:50 +0100 Wei-Kai, I'm wondering if you've been able to repeat your stress test with a later FreeBSD release and have seen a better performance behavior? If so, please report back if we can close this PR. Thanks!