From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Nov 23 9:30: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3196E37B417 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:30:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id fANHU2D23061; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:30:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:30:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200111231730.fANHU2D23061@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Maxim Sobolev Subject: Re: ports/32231: Update port devel/fam Reply-To: Maxim Sobolev Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/32231; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Sobolev To: ishmael27@home.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/32231: Update port devel/fam Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:27:39 +0200 (EET) > Update fam to latest version, 2.6.6. > > ports/devel/fam should be repo-copied to ports/sysutils/fam. > When originally creating this port, I mistakenly placed it in devel section > rather than sysutils, where it more properly belongs. Note that this would > require altering x11/kdelibs2 and devel/fampp LIB_DEPENDS. > > This update also remove files/patch-freebsd, which touched multiple files, and > instead adds several individual patch files. Does it really work on FreeBSD? I am curious because I had almost completed from-scratch implementation based around BSD kquque(2) interface and planning to release it to the world really soon. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message