Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:55:17 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de> Cc: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>, questions-list freebsd <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: best archiver? (for music) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903141353090.37274@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <49BB9907.5040101@janh.de> References: 20090314030558.GB25027@thought.org <49BB9907.5040101@janh.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> For the same reason, you do not convert between lossy formats. Each might > give different kinds of artifacts that you do not want to combine. (Of especially true with mp3 and ogg > Are you sure you can hear the difference between your flac originals and > "--preset standard" lame encoded mp3? Consider a "double blind" test. i'm almost sure he can't. > I have never tested if I can hear the difference between an mp3 that come > from the original or an mp3 that comes from a higher bitrate ogg. Actually, I for me - hearing the difference between mp3 @ 128kbit CBR (compressed with lame) and uncompressed is on the edge of detection.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903141353090.37274>