From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 9 6:52:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from imsp211.netvigator.com (imsp211.netvigator.com [205.252.144.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75D115DD5 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 1999 06:52:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sbirdy@netvigator.com) Received: from netvigator.com (olkc8176.netvigator.com [208.167.252.176]) by imsp211.netvigator.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA25338 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 1999 21:51:56 +0800 (HKT) Message-ID: <37D7C23E.3B37D277@netvigator.com> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 22:20:46 +0800 From: Billy Ma X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NATD performance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear all, We are using Freebsd 3.0 to run NATD to solve the insufficient IP. Client is win95/98, However, after run NATD, the Network seem so slow, and we have to wait for sometime 15-20 sec. , then we will see the icons on the network(windows). Before, we use Freebsd 2.2.5, runing the same things, the major different is we using 128 IP only, just 2/3 Sec. we will see the icons appear on the network(windows), Now we using the whole class C IP 256. Is it the major problem make it slow down ? We have around 100 users, may be more later, Do you know any parameter I can amend in the kernel to improve the NATD performance ? THANKS !! Best Regards, Billy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message