From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Jan 11 12:18:54 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (rdu57-28-046.nc.rr.com [66.57.28.46])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8532F37B402; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (marcus@localhost)
	by shumai.marcuscom.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0BKJ9H81260;
	Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:19:09 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: shumai.marcuscom.com: marcus owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:19:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Joe Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To: Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net>
Cc: dwcjr@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD Ports List <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: CUPS support can be unconditional
In-Reply-To: <20020111144245.T80091-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com>
Message-ID: <20020111151705.Q80091-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

I'd actually like to propose another compromise to this issue.  If people
agree with cups-base bloat is okay, then we need a pkg-message telling
users that if they _really_ want to CUPS printing support in Samba, they
need to build cups-lpr.

I still think that by only partially enabling CUPS support in Samba,
you'll be confusing people, but by having a pkg-message, you'll help to
avert some questions and confusion.

Joe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message