Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Nov 1996 12:20:30 -0600 (CST)
From:      Gary Clark II <gclarkii@main.gbdata.com>
To:        andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm)
Cc:        fenner@parc.xerox.com, se@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Need "a" ghostscript
Message-ID:  <199611081820.MAA01667@main.gbdata.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.961107213152.10779B-100000@klemm.gtn.com> from Andreas Klemm at "Nov 7, 96 09:35:05 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Klemm wrote:
<SNIP>
> 
> I think we could remove ghostscript 2.6.2 and 3.x port. gs4 seems
> pretty stable. No need to keep several versions like with tcl/tk.
I'm concerned with the license on gs4.  I belive it is more restrictive
than the ones on 2 & 3.

> 
> Does somebody have something against removal of gs2 and gs3 port ?!
> 
> 	Andreas ///
> 
Gary

-- 
Gary Clark II   (N5VMF) |    I speak only for myself and "maybe" my company 
gclarkii@GBData.COM     |          Member of the FreeBSD Doc Team 
  Providing Internet and ISP startups mail info@GBData.COM for information
   FreeBSD FAQ at ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/docs/freebsd-faq.ascii 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611081820.MAA01667>