From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 19 23:29:58 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EA016A4B3
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(adsl-64-169-107-253.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.253])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8506543FB1
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5])
	by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 69B3866D6A; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 40C7FA88; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:29:40 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
Message-ID: <20030920062940.GA35054@rot13.obsecurity.org>
References: <3F6BF02F.9040707@schmalzbauer.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F6BF02F.9040707@schmalzbauer.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports and -current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 06:29:58 -0000


--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:14:07AM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Well, for weeks now I couldn't compile (almost) any port. It seems that=
=20
> ports aren't tested against -current. Is that true?

No.

> Not only the -pthread removement broke countless ports (some of them are=
=20
> easy to fix others aren't) also the entire new kde fails.
> Is there no aim to have ports running on -current?

Also incorrect.  The 4.9 ports freeze is holding up commits to fix
compile failures on 5.1.

Kris
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/a/PTWry0BWjoQKURAkrIAJ0a5yOKuyBDScP3hd2wzLJKjuMlcgCgpNul
Ic8QE58acIoGIcpXvotLJMM=
=qx/T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--