From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 21:37:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A43E1065675; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101568FC1B; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:d0fa:b5e9:395b:990e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:d0fa:b5e9:395b:990e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 515F65C37; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:37:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F528F24.5040909@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 22:37:40 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <201203031858.q23IwGvG096048@svn.freebsd.org> <4F5278F8.2020109@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F5278F8.2020109@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r232473 - in head: share/mk sys/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 21:37:37 -0000 On 2012-03-03 21:03, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/03/2012 10:58, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> However, since it is apparently an expected use case to build using old >> .mk files, > > Expected how? It shouldn't happen if you're building in /usr/src. No, but it apparently happens if you build kernel modules separately, or via ports. Or if you build kernel modules for head from older branches. > Wouldn't it be better to track down the real bug? Obviously that would be better, but I received several private messages from people that were annoyed that I "broke" their kernel module builds, and expected me to fix it. There was also at least one such posting on freebsd-current@, where somebody's nvidia-driver port fell over due to my change. I did think about adding a fatal error message to each of the kern.mk files that includes bsd.own.mk, but you can't really do a full sanity check until you add some sort of version number to the bsd.*.mk files.