From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 29 11:25:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1B616A4BF for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D6443FE9 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:25:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7TIPKQX068864; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:25:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7TIPK20068863; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:25:19 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Mike Jakubik Message-ID: <20030829182519.GA14251@dragon.nuxi.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Mike Jakubik , Current References: <20030829154843.GO5234@starjuice.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Current Subject: Re: buildworld failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:25:22 -0000 On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:36:46PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > I think the impact is more social. People will try to compile world and get > failures. Specially people coming from the 4.x branch, where this sort of > think never occurred. If this is the only thing preventing a clean makeworld > with -O2, I think its worth taking a look at. Agreed. At this point with GCC 3.3.1, I think all the -O2 bugs are bugs in FreeBSD code -- lack of 'volatile' (or over use of it), wrong asm constraints, etc...