From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 19 18:20:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8D016A4A7 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC2143D68 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:20:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:20:31 -0400 id 00056416.4537C1EF.00005E11 Received: from Internal Mail-Server (206.210.89.202) by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Oct 2006 14:15:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:20:30 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-Id: <20061019142030.9d4b6897.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20061019195557.M97577@192.168.11.51> References: <20061019195557.M97577@192.168.11.51> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: having more than one process write to one log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:20:35 -0000 In response to Zbigniew Szalbot : > Hello, > > I will appreciate your advice. Is it possible and *safe* to allow two > different processes (dovecot and exim) to write to one log? Better not do > it? I would like to have both data in one log but... don't want to cause > problems. I don't think Windows would allow it. How about FBSD? That's what syslogd is for. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. **************************************************************** IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. ****************************************************************