From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Thu Jan 14 10:16:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9D3A82D8F for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56C581454 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven@multiplay.co.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f206so337041147wmf.0 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 02:16:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=multiplay-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NG8Tvht+JlnjMmvfxjAwEagX+bKd41lINDysYqPYEGk=; b=QQx8QY/utZa8efXV4cktCVI4we/CNnH8M5SlU6ZT3lIEsD1A9IgzJqyg+2uiavIcbk zIXL1wGPvswPI/zclxA6xolaU8+cEEbHG5IXHMcolgp1qXoUFFxaUbmTCHFFnIBvnnQO rfhKqQzWoFN3HkoyNPC0qr4xUmq/+3yTgUeX+qUgF2vQ2Z+vF6mD8NHl18jX/cdziB8q sZsJ2NlX7s03JAhAk05wJVkEnBnwPyHUZxHFaPvq05R0gxmd2H5LFUZg091r8HH/IEMd JgSqiJQDsI2XqR8UnGTvpO0McEY1edx3WxocYnu2Wr4nuhNUIc3aW65NcdlXwuy/GFfw CMLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NG8Tvht+JlnjMmvfxjAwEagX+bKd41lINDysYqPYEGk=; b=EsMiSqgw7nN3CnoanI/BCCf2oBtI5b5sr0XyA759bYKCAWkgu+HC29xo/bVhsDIgEu EEc4R5BfS4cYiXjQrwBtUG+GGEa7kLDbCcSzs9lJUfKmg2VXpZgJZQnmop+KjkiSdhNz 6MYv0oAyNUb0G333bVvSGb0fVfNGlBHU6FwHiQxWfXRyTS/KVF3lz3vOR0Wq+04LF06h JMwa9gFokmIA9IZKfZ27UUKe6H2WWWSWtdW0XOxcJTAEXLyW6+9yoDbnx+eWKzsFbA/G 5AKqpnJ2rqGgq5jix3znWITbCRSPbjVM1K5nqrsu0w2WQv0Tv08hj6Y561CUffbWpleK X+dg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm62YoSzZ7DNTgx7tn/B9U4bwDWm9Gsyv26MSp1EWRi3JNXOE8MVcylAmfm1mMzrDEQEySYR83wYS51qtwbq+Lzew16MA== X-Received: by 10.28.68.68 with SMTP id r65mr4067567wma.95.1452766579894; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 02:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.58] (liv3d.labs.multiplay.co.uk. [82.69.141.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k130sm6607074wmg.6.2016.01.14.02.16.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 02:16:18 -0800 (PST) From: Steven Hartland X-Google-Original-From: Steven Hartland Subject: Re: svn commit: r293903 - in head/sys/boot: arm/uboot efi/fdt efi/libefi To: Andrew Turner References: <201601140922.u0E9M1rV025146@repo.freebsd.org> <20160114101343.70e73d01@zapp> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56977585.4020100@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:16:37 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160114101343.70e73d01@zapp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:16:21 -0000 On 14/01/2016 10:13, Andrew Turner wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:22:01 +0000 (UTC) > Steven Hartland wrote: > >> Author: smh >> Date: Thu Jan 14 09:22:01 2016 >> New Revision: 293903 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293903 >> >> Log: >> Fix GCC warnings causing build failure after r293724 >> >> Disable some compiler warnings for GCC (non-standard compiler) >> fixing build failures introduced by r293724, which enabled WARNS in >> the EFI boot code, when compiling with none standard compiler (GCC). >> >> Raised by: ian >> MFC after: 2 weeks >> X-MFC-With: r293268 >> Sponsored by: Multiplay > The attached would be a better (however untested) solution. Given we > don't build boot1.efi or loader.efi with gcc it extends this to all the > EFI code. > > Andrew Not sure I like that idea as it would prevent people using EFI from having a working system if they also choose GCC.