Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:35:00 +0000
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
To:        Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Message-ID:  <AANLkTi=gGti9vHh99=gD=YHv9UBKm7Y90me4hc_=61s9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110201.103104.1311071912952655963.chat95@mac.com>
References:  <AANLkTinCUuWET3dFVzpTRPfAiqG7hfdPJrAxY=OWVxff@mail.gmail.com> <20110201.103104.1311071912952655963.chat95@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/2/1 Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com>:
> From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
> Subject: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
>
>> I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a
>> pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3h30
>> with java)
>
> Strange, full build with bundled libraries took 2h-2h30 on my Q6600 for OpenOffice.org
> port.
>
> Thanks,
> -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
>

I do not use ccache or anything like that. here a full bundle
libraries took about 4 hours for OpenOffice.org.

that mean my box is not very optimized ;) thanks for reporting I have
a deeper look at that.

regards,

Bapt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=gGti9vHh99=gD=YHv9UBKm7Y90me4hc_=61s9>