Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:26:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211141] pkg+pw: doesn't run pwd_mkdb, maybe other problems Message-ID: <bug-211141-32340-KkBDEtovCy@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-211141-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-211141-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211141 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pkg@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Open Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(pkg@Fr | |eeBSD.org), | |merge-quarterly? Keywords| |needs-qa --- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- The original category was base system / bin, the post-triage category is po= rts & packages, which (as a product) doesn't have versions except head/quarterly (hence 'latest'). This is different than the version under which a particul= ar issue is occurring (the system with the issue) If the issue is *actually* in the pkg(8) bootstrap system or binary in the = base system, rather than the pkg port/package (the third party code that is installed by the bootstrap), then the issue should indeed be re-classified.= If not, it is correctly classified currently, and further should/could also be reported upstream: https://github.com/freebsd/pkg It's unclear at the moment why 10.3 is unaffected but 11.0 is not, but that does not itself necessarily mean its a base issue Leaving to maintainer to classify accordingly post investigation --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-211141-32340-KkBDEtovCy>