From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 13:32:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC6716A404 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [65.124.230.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC0613C44B for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693F22E0039 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:31:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Duane Hill X-X-Sender: d.hill@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070518141045.490c80be@gumby.homeunix.com.> Message-ID: <20070518132807.Q17258@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> References: <20070516182846.C34584@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> <464BCE1A.4020400@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20070517102831.O61920@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> <20070518141045.490c80be@gumby.homeunix.com.> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: amd64 FreeBSD Release 5.5 -> 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:32:06 -0000 On Fri, 18 May 2007, RW wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:39:35 +0000 (UTC) > Duane Hill wrote: > >> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> > >>> You should be able to upgrade the system by a routine buildworld, >>> buildkernel ... type operation, but beware that you will need to >>> recompile all of your ports because of potential shlib version >>> clashes. Ports from 5.5 will still work on 6.2, but later trying to >>> update them piecemeal can lead to misery. >> >> I'm using portupgrade. So I will use the switches force a reinstall >> and to act on everything that depends on the reinstalled port (-fr). >> > > > That wont do anything useful as there is nothing for the -r to work > with after a base-system upgrade. > > The best way to upgrade all ports with portupgrade is to do it by > datestamp like this: > > portupgrade -f '<2007-05-18 14:00' What about: portupgrade -afR Wouldn't that force everything including ports that depend on the one being reinstalled?