From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 22 07:03:43 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4E2106567A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5908FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5M73fxq026751;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:03:41 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5M73f10026748; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:03:41 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:03:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FE41288.5020404@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206220903190.26684@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <201206201015.q5KAFKKj026496@mail.r-bonomi.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201353500.24316@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120620171112.GB23095@hemlock.hydra> <4FE41288.5020404@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:03:42 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:03:44 -0000

>> underway to make sure the base system will compile cleanly with both
>> Clang and GCC 4.2+, so I think you're just making up complaints here.
>> Someone (other than Wojciech Puchar, who would just be talking out of his

once again personal attacks  from unhappy childs.

>> ass) correct me if I'm mistaken.
> reported by gcc46 warning
>
> Approved by:    cperciva (implicit)
>
> So at least there are some people working on polishing CURRENT/STABLE up to 
> the point it will build with gcc46.
>
sounds good.