From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 10 19:26:02 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA01113 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:26:02 -0700 Received: from seaquest (seaquest.sea.legent.com [155.35.41.137]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA01106 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:25:55 -0700 Received: by seaquest (5.x/SMI-SVR4(DEO-022095 Problems to obrien@sea.legent.com)) id AA28809; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 22:25:20 -0400 From: obrien@Sea.Legent.com (David O'Brien) Message-Id: <9507110225.AA28809@seaquest> Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 22:25:20 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Dmitry@Sea.Legent.com, Khrustalev@Sea.Legent.com, In-Reply-To: <1503.805413305@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jul 10, 95 02:55:05 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP2] Content-Type: text Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Subject: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi > > >Description: > > Tin cannot find sendmail and vi executables, it looks for > /usr/lib/sendmail and /usr/ucb/vi. > I would suggest working from the tin 1.30 beta rather than 1.22. tin.h has changed slightly, but this problem (and now another one) still exists. In addition to grep'ing for __NetBSD__ and adding __FreeBSD__ to the list (isn't there a common predefined symbol that could catch both??? how about adding __bsd4_4__ to both or something), screen.c needs a mod. Change line 80 (#else) to ``# elif !defined(__FreeBSD__)''. BTW, tin 1.30 can be gotten from ftp.scn.de:/pub/news/tin. Watch the definition of ``SPOOLDIR'' in the Makefile. -- David (obrien@sea.legent.com)