From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 21:07:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFA6106564A; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mwi1.coffeenet.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216658FC13; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:07:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:Content-Type; bh=7eIBfVd7LCXOYp1ezWltHqvuglG/nxN9dcuihy9xhEU=; b=NtaHO8HNLmd3d7Uf6jDWWrQZBdvh/bowVfY1WXpoQpQMeQp9vGfzVDAVAc58GjtqZRf1PfS0+mtG0e9TmOC/APvqRpzni0HYC3MmzhUaaM1fzfLFOeaTPj+UElA6oldO; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mwi1.coffeenet.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RkMQj-000Dfh-IR; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:07:13 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1326143211-88972-88971/5/10; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:06:51 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <891fe25c-1560-479f-b855-1713c1c7a976@email.android.com> <20120108.052346.1749642548460957219.hrs@allbsd.org> <20120110.040224.1057547871207328114.hrs@allbsd.org> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:06:51 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20120110.040224.1057547871207328114.hrs@allbsd.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.61 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.0 Cc: Subject: Re: accepting rtadv broken on 9-STABLE, re driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:07:14 -0000 On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:02:24 -0600, Hiroki Sato wrote: > re0 seems to have ACCEPT_RTADV. What is the problem? That's because I haven't rebooted.... Let's start fresh. The normal ipv6 configuration anyone would use: -ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES" in rc.conf -NO mention of net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv in sysctl.conf I boot up, re0 *does not* have ACCEPT_RTADV. I try forcing via the sysctl: net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv=1 Still doesn't work! I finally have to result to: ifconfig re0 inet6 accept_rtadv Why? What makes this machine different? All the other machines I run do not require this to get ACCEPT_RTADV. Is it the re driver? My other machines have em and ath interfaces. Thanks, Mark