Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:31:07 +0100 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Matt <mhersant@comcast.net> Subject: Re: retricted environment Message-ID: <200503012131.15528.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <4224CF06.7060103@comcast.net> References: <4224CF06.7060103@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart277483390.gHWZcVMIyF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 01 March 2005 21:22, Matt wrote: > When providing a shell environment for a larger number of users, what is > the best way to retrict access to commands/resources? I've already > setup quotas. I don't want users playing with system commands. I've > read something about a retricted shell, but can't find any details. I am not sure a restricted shell is the best sollution for interactive setu= ps,=20 but one is availale from src/contrib/sendmail/smrsh. See README for usage= =20 and build information. This, however, is more a thing for cvs-wrappers or= =20 stuff like that. =46or interactive environments you can use the normal group/user permission= s and=20 of course jail(8)s. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart277483390.gHWZcVMIyF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCJNETXyyEoT62BG0RAjJwAJ4zj0sU7JYWJ5Y5aFsp2YlsmKnlegCdH0sF dtygorzTmqigFJ0SrHReAuk= =MueK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart277483390.gHWZcVMIyF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503012131.15528.max>