From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 28 18:06:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7766310656AB for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from www.sonnenberger.org (www.ostsee-abc.de [62.206.222.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43698FC16 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:06:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.sonnenberger.org [192.168.1.10]) by www.sonnenberger.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2928A6670C for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:06:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5F8F1BDD7C; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:06:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:06:24 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090428180624.GA2223@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20090427183836.GA10793@zim.MIT.EDU> <49F5FE45.2090101@freebsd.org> <20090427193326.GA7654@britannica.bec.de> <20090427194904.GA11137@zim.MIT.EDU> <49F6C7A1.6070708@FreeBSD.org> <20090428122225.GA2862@britannica.bec.de> <24e9a86bf5995ba551db8f27aa204191.squirrel@webmail.kovesdan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <24e9a86bf5995ba551db8f27aa204191.squirrel@webmail.kovesdan.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Subject: Re: SoC 2009: BSD-licensed libiconv in base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:06:26 -0000 On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 03:53:10PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote: > >> It's possible that there are little poor countries with an own writing > >> system but probably their writing system is unsupported because the > >> starvation, poorness and lack of water and electricity are more serious > >> problems there. > > > > I wouldn't call all both parts of Korea little poor countries and it is > > a wonderful example for why UCS 4 Level 1 can be problematic. > > > > > I didn't know about Korea. Then I insist even more on that Unicode should > be extended to cover them instead of making implementation-specific > solutions. Unicode covers Korean. It just violates the "one logic character equals one UCS-4 character" or however you want to put. More trivial example can be obtained when looking at both your and my name. Diacrets have historically been part of the character, but it is possible to use combining characters in unicode for the cleaner description. Joerg