Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:44:10 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists@toco-domains.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Impact of missing IPv6 support on portstree Message-ID: <1452177850.2464813.485521242.766C9F33@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <568E266F.6090906@toco-domains.de> References: <5655B1CD.4050009@toco-domains.de> <56712BFA.9030202@toco-domains.de> <1452109905.2214619.484784714.3E332B18@webmail.messagingengine.com> <568E266F.6090906@toco-domains.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:48, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > > On 06.01.2016 20:51, Mark Felder wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015, at 03:16, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > >> > >> In conclusion: if you having an IPv6 only machine, you could not build > >> 69.4 % of the ports. > > > > distcache.freebsd.org is reachable over IPv6. Distfiles should *still* > > be fetchable over IPv6, but I don't know if there are edge cases where > > distfiles aren't cached eg due to the MASTER_SITES being CHEESESHOP > > (pypi), etc. > > Therefore i wrote: > "To check if a port is available for IPv6 i excluded the > distcache.freebsd.org host, because it is not part of the port." > I missed this statement, sorry. I do agree we need to reach out to these parties. -- Mark Felder ports-secteam member feld@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1452177850.2464813.485521242.766C9F33>