From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 14 09:25:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C7716A4D6; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B5D43FAF; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:25:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAEHNtMg019660; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:23:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)hAEHNsCh019657; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:23:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:23:54 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Brian Feldman cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/conf kern.post.mk kmod.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:25:52 -0000 On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > On 14-Nov-2003 Brian Feldman wrote: > > green 2003/11/14 08:04:11 PST > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/conf kern.post.mk kmod.mk > > Log: > > Include opt_global.h in the modules build, when building from a normal > > kernel build. This makes it possible for me not to get pissed off that > > random.ko crashes the system trying to rdtsc() when the i386/cpu.h > > support code decides it's okay to call that op when neither I386_CPU or > > I486_CPU is defined. I guess it also makes WITNESS/INVARIANTS defines > > get picked up by the modules. > > WITNESS doesn't matter as all calls to it are done in the actual locking > code itself which does not lives in modules. Modules always call the > locking functions and don't inline locking operations. I'd have picked up the syntax error in mac_test.c if this had been in place then :-). And it makes mac_test and other regression test modules far more functional... Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories