From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 9 21:16:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81790E9; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4789E8FC0A; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B1DA84E; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 23:16:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BA52CEC00; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 23:15:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 23:15:47 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: java diablo-jdk Message-ID: <20121009231547.1f4cfa57@davenulle.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; i386-portbld-freebsd9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:16:21 -0000 Hello, I do not see the point to keep diablo-jdk as a build dependency of java. Is there something that prevent us to distribute a package of openjdk, just to be able to built a native version of openjdk or sunjdk ? I'm tired of the "fetch the diablo-jdk from FreeBSD and agree with the license". And even more since I use poudriere to build packages. The FreeBSD java support is not bad (I'm happy with it, I can do all my Java developpement on FreeBSD using netbeans and openjdk) but this dependency on diablo really sucks. We don't need this IMO. What do you think of this? Regards. (CC freebsd-java, please CC me)