From owner-freebsd-security Wed Feb 3 00:50:31 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA25393 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 00:50:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.149.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA25385; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 00:50:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cheops.anu.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA25314; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 19:50:19 +1100 (EDT) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <199902030850.TAA25314@cheops.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: tcpdump To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 19:50:18 +1100 (EDT) Cc: jmb@FreeBSD.ORG, woodford@cc181716-a.hwrd1.md.home.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <9575.918011566@zippy.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Feb 2, 99 07:12:46 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In some mail from Jordan K. Hubbard, sie said: > > OK, time to raise this topic again. What to people think about > enabling bpfilter by default in GENERIC? What are the implications for the kernel size for boot floppies ? Any repercussions for low memory pc's ? IMHO, that is the only reason (oh, and stability) for enabling/disabling things in GENERIC. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message