From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 11:29:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102C916A41F for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:29:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB46343D49 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:29:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so2056206wra for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:29:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp:user-agent; b=KNjvW1gaOg8xQ96HvcathGg0xvtUFiYavG2ba/0DK5k0hn42njEUIkbjxp39bfu0vDgrHKTmfko1OuknvgPftBvMU/hJfc24i3ETY+GZeM4eCalfni1NzHzaidg+HEJOJF8mCkNuXKZ4r0+UUei+lLZ4kPY9oleyYsV6oLjeY5s= Received: by 10.54.57.11 with SMTP id f11mr1772096wra; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:29:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [194.186.150.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 33sm174650wra.2005.09.11.04.29.19; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:28:16 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050911112816.GA755@lame.novel.ru> References: <200509091534.j89FY2Qi043829@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050909170934.GA42230@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050910044627.GA761@lame.novel.ru> <20050910052129.GA49500@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050910123802.GA669@lame.novel.ru> <20050910175757.GA52565@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050910175757.GA52565@xor.obsecurity.org> X-PGP: http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/novel.key.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Roman Bogorodskiy , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/gnutls Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:29:43 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kris wrote: > > Even if there were, I think it's quite obvious that port which has been > > removed from the ports tree should be deinstalled from user's system,= =20 > > isn't it? BTW, portupgrade notes when there are such kind of ports in > > the system. > >=20 > > I think the proper solution is deinstalling obsolete port (i.e. gnutls-= devel > > in our case) from the system, but not CONFLICTing with dead ports' ghos= ts. > > And Porters Handbook doesn't say we should CONFLICT with nonexistent po= rts. > >=20 > > Am I missing something? >=20 > The point of CONFLICTS is to prevent two ports from spamming each > other with the same installed files. That's exactly what would happen > if someone still has gnutls-devel installed (it was only removed a few > days ago) and tries to install this one, so it makes perfect sense to > me that you should keep it there. Done. But how long should it be kept? Roman Bogorodskiy --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQyQU0IB0WzgdqspGAQLZWwP+K+h5+Yz+D4vxwWUX7rEKHORMLtvMW1SA WGo1fRHaJJIWoazIJJ9GW05bBc2Jpg8cW//CLtdk6Fe0NsjrlN1S1hJmxCdGMy1Q BVisPlWFG0DiuR7q7i1Q0AYH0MyfAhk9O3BQDK2sURjX1e1nCDHXMlZGOaaPq1Q0 oHFne5hb808= =ar9N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--