From owner-freebsd-small Fri Jul 28 15:33:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from dante.high5.net (dante.high5.net [194.109.18.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F31637BE54 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:33:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mischa@dante.high5.net) Received: (from mischa@localhost) by dante.high5.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA46904; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 00:32:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mischa) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 00:32:55 +0200 From: Mischa Peters To: Warner Losh Cc: Albert Yang , freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Structure? Message-ID: <20000729003255.B72431@high5.net> References: <39819359.5807.123A2B0@localhost> <200007282214.QAA60182@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200007282214.QAA60182@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 04:14:32PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 04:14:32PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <39819359.5807.123A2B0@localhost> "Albert Yang" writes: > : OK guys, I was thinking we should throw together an agreed upon > : structure for Pico? I was thinking we'd do like FreeBSD, have a > : stable and a current; with maybe 4 releases to the stable tree every > : year, or whenever we feel that a release is stable. > > The version numbers are a stupid idea. Because? Mischa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message