From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun May 12 20:41:55 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA09923
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 12 May 1996 20:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA09913
          Sun, 12 May 1996 20:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id UAA01516; Sun, 12 May 1996 20:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 20:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199605130341.UAA01516@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: mark@grondar.za
CC: ache@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199605122046.WAA00581@grumble.grondar.za> (message from Mark Murray on Sun, 12 May 1996 22:46:29 +0200)
Subject: Re: LESS cleanup?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * > The usual convention in ports' Makefiles is to only check for the
 * > existence of a variable.
 * 
 * Sure. I borrowed the above from SSH, though...

I think it was because it had a USA_RESIDENT variable which could be
either YES or NO.  The rest of them are booleans so the YES check
should be taken out.

 * > Also, please make it accept the alternate spelling to make us in the
 * > ,              ,
 * > Etats-Unis d'Amerique happy. :>
 * 
 * D'accord, Mon ami! Pour vous, c'est COLOR. Voulez vous COULEUR avez,
 * aussi?

Err, je ne sais pas parler francais.... ;)
                               '
Satochi