From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Aug 13 9:27:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns.internet.dk (ns.internet.dk [194.19.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE69537B69A for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 09:27:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id SAA79104 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 18:27:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.0.14]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.11.0/8.9.3) with SMTP id e7DGR2573985 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 18:27:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Message-ID: <004401c00543$50c661a0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> Reply-To: "Leif Neland" From: "Leif Neland" To: Subject: 2 inetd's with 2 nics Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 18:26:14 +0200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is it possible and a good idea to have one inetd for the inside nic and another with fewer services for the outside on a gateway machine, or should I just use ipfw/ipchain for this? Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message