From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org  Wed Oct 28 21:04:47 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0352A20E91
 for <freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from dave.mehler@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B12915EB
 for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from dave.mehler@gmail.com)
Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so26841464wic.1
 for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=6JUkzHtUsrJSWhMWn4e0GiytiieqgbE9loUrI2GDWgc=;
 b=hJKZWNFK5O9haib9hyof8o0TBn75pBlkcK9eSD/C3kdH76Chq0RzIUKXrlzXj9fUYB
 zzJk+DvYT7+bPuty06lH/ePzCTfoCv8BkHVyM6/T/jChAI15NsNlsVFh5Az869NfzH3N
 j+CnoDWFDHy4vIpQi/L+cJcc5i3GP126Pxqm8BNMtkmkAYc+ck2sDSnWgnM19MBkxfQV
 05yIfCuq6TMfgFRfolt+FgjG38od2tlH/d0gJ8R5zwkH6lCJBgubNo7aH5OXpcpOvNMq
 Jo8NAWhezltsk3FNDYCAEDZkebtUrU8XGG7BDNsK90t6Jm0B8jLmedPz9MpzmQ6VPmos
 sL9A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.171.69 with SMTP id as5mr54424125wjc.137.1446066285630; 
 Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.162.100 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:04:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPORhP73BJSDHGo08ibeLzTPADJqcQUftwgs=DF6E0fOfffO6g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Ip not configured on local interface
From: David Mehler <dave.mehler@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:04:47 -0000

Hello,

I'm running a FreeBSD 10.2 system and running jails created by ezjail.
I'm getting an error on jail creation that the IP selected for the
jail is not configured on any local interface, for example
192.168.0.1.

This machine has only a single NIC connected to the network and I'm
cloning it repeatedly to a lo1 interface.

After reading list traffic I'm wondering if my method, which I last
used several years back in the 5.4 days, is no longer valid.
Performance on my jails is sluggish, sometimes they have a hard time
reaching the internet sometimes they don't work at all, for example I
have a caching nameserver defined on the 192.168.x.x subnet and jails
on that subnet can't reach it.

Is there something better out there than ezjail? If so, how hard will
it be to migrate configurations over? I've got two jails, the first
the caching nameserver, the second a web server/test server with a
great many packages.

Thanks.
Dave.