From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 19 23:31:22 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA8116A4B3
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lakemtao08.cox.net (lakemtao08.cox.net [68.1.17.113])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE0943FE0
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mezz7@cox.net)
Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.37.247]) by lakemtao08.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
          id <20030920063120.GYRZ16616.lakemtao08.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>;
          Sat, 20 Sep 2003 02:31:20 -0400
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 01:30:10 -0500
To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
References: <3F6BF02F.9040707@schmalzbauer.de>
From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <oprvscckuv8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <3F6BF02F.9040707@schmalzbauer.de>
User-Agent: Opera7.20/Linux M2 build 465
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports and -current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 06:31:22 -0000

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:14:07 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer 
<h@schmalzbauer.de> wrote:

> Well, for weeks now I couldn't compile (almost) any port. It seems that 
> ports aren't tested against -current. Is that true?
> Not only the -pthread removement broke countless ports (some of them are 
> easy to fix others aren't) also the entire new kde fails.
> Is there no aim to have ports running on -current?

Check in the bottom at 
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2003-September/002846.html 
.. I believe, we should be expect to see the many fixes for -CURRENT when 
the ports freeze lift.

Cheers,
Mezz

> I'm asking because my "workstation" has enough resources to track 
> -current to help testing. But if I breake ports with -current I won't 
> keep tracking it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Harry


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.