Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:50:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> To: David Greenman <dg@root.com> Cc: Roman Katsnelson <romank@graphnet.com>, "q's" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: DNS hardware needs under 2.2.7 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809251147070.20934-100000@duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us> In-Reply-To: <199809251600.JAA25652@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, David Greenman wrote: > BIND doesn't seem to consume a whole lot of CPU, but it does consume a lot > of memory - typically 30-40MB on a busy server. That may be reason enough to > have it on a seperate machine. We have both Apache and DNS on the same > server at WC CDROM, but we have lots of memory in the machine (512MB) and > the machine has CPU to burn (333MHz Pentium-II and only 1/2 million hits/day). Is that "1 to 2" or "one half" million? -- Chris Dillon - cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us - cdillon@inter-linc.net /* FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet. For Intel x86 and compatibles (SPARC and Alpha under development) (http://www.freebsd.org) */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809251147070.20934-100000>