From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 06:35:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDDA34190C for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobik@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49r05s2qs1z4DYN for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobik@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 612C2341909; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F63341854 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobik@FreeBSD.org) Received: from forward3-smtp.messagingengine.com (forward3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r05s0ckKz4Dml; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobik@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailforward.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8203F1940044; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:35:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap1 ([10.202.2.51]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:35:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=pg2TF4 xvqmClO02pMIWCFL2Wcp1PAv+LLlfTmQz/RWY=; b=iY4CCcajDC6g4YL8rStBJx VdIg3lCbWdZ7t8pBrctNdmn7gS1AxNleDU64R5wBN8AwKdLL2AmyEN1rPl9Ol6lU mln6d/ECTpmQJpFriWbpojEfcit5IqiBXaqM14YNg2l80nVrpSo+v9NChuPUJ6AP Qzi2tlz8K/hsH60DDN9bP3uLt3vcOgCmzmzQPDbkeo+a0dteYHdFj8pbgfS56yLp eS8Wq1M+YN8F4VPh4t7tl5BxYvEttIWWMsqoUfM7JWVPN3ruDIwSarlWyYSSifm2 uF+zbQ2jQPyYvZ/WqYon2SVMgNKhsX8B030qgHSDKnas9HbMtkyqYTqkp3bahNOA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudekuddguddtudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfvfho sghirghsucfmohhrthhkrghmphdfuceothhosghikheshfhrvggvuefuffdrohhrgheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeetgeevgefftedvueffveefudeugfetueeukeelhfeiiedt teeftedugfefveegnecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhosghikheshfhrvggv uefuffdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4F651C200A5; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:35:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-543-gda70334-fm-20200618.004-gda703345 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <27f5739b-6bce-4b1c-8ca2-5b79e783b67d@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:35:08 +0000 From: "Tobias Kortkamp" To: "Kyle Evans" Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports failing with -fno-common with clang 9/gcc 9 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r05s0ckKz4Dml X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:35:29 -0000 On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, at 14:56, Kyle Evans wrote: > In any event, I would urge folks to be proactive and identify this > stuff, reporting issues upstream and spreading awareness of the > impending default change for those projects that may not already be > actively aware. > > On a closing note, I'm just going to kinda drop these patches here for > anyone that's willing/able to help make this a collective effort to > identify/fix/report problems here; they backport the default > -fno-common patch from future-LLVM11 to the base system compiler on a > system near you: > > HEAD: https://people.freebsd.org/~kevans/llvm-fnocommon-head.diff Can you ask for an exp-run with this patch applied? There needs to be a comprehensive list of failing ports for people to be able to work on this. We see some failing ports because of default -fno-common in GCC 10 [1] already. [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246700