From nobody Mon Apr 3 16:59:40 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PqxwB0Rjtz4311T; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-f51.google.com (mail-ua1-f51.google.com [209.85.222.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Pqxw95cLNz4JC3; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-ua1-f51.google.com with SMTP id p91so4192102uap.1; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:00:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680541208; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+HHb1leWJXYdUgaOf8lqTYr4cUYwaR7f/PtGEWXU+ns=; b=fdEU2KBb/kB/o0oYWKd2/GBDC5wjXtN1RR1y78Hn7oiWV/rY/7lVwGQfpLTTyNapws BN/RVOT3rmztV3hcXofynEwdIjb1N0X231wtXSIHBSoAzGSv/JWVLK8dHVT6CkfsSd6i VUI6Q6LWACpq9b+zQxAxnVolIT5DmEQuAV7l8cbcPeJtfArEQFxHmALSX6Pze0YCuJ+P Bn996gHZ3N2aiUvgy4PxlR2rmlWwcdVYxYQRjYLC2KIsBSt++va/zooTWeyHJ+LZCtX6 hF/r2ecqG1DtvL/DkE9Lj3FchxOuzR7mZHdde/N2uAgLVBswZhdtlYQ56NlzPQS7REIZ bnXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9c5ouCFUSpqAYWnM3pMe4udiTyq+pr0ZFo6C+SQAXLM8V81hDby lxSmOai+vCmlwaujZ+TuWGeWyyH4TB3uEGCa X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YkeG6vTE7DzvFBaUBP5eMw8oJUaulym1Uy4W0IrVcIfz239nteXAcfkkMIqET7+MHXSXd6bw== X-Received: by 2002:a1f:2601:0:b0:432:2146:9af6 with SMTP id m1-20020a1f2601000000b0043221469af6mr26559vkm.13.1680541208205; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vs1-f45.google.com (mail-vs1-f45.google.com. [209.85.217.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y128-20020a1f3286000000b0043c143e643bsm1761290vky.48.2023.04.03.10.00.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-f45.google.com with SMTP id df34so25966635vsb.8; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:00:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a67:c19a:0:b0:426:b051:1c4 with SMTP id h26-20020a67c19a000000b00426b05101c4mr167151vsj.0.1680541206852; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:00:06 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202304031415.333EFmQx016670@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <998481bfbf4a242146f9d783a5831e4b@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: From: Gleb Popov Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 19:59:40 +0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: 93eaa5412bfc - main - security/howdy: Face recognition based authentication provider. To: Daniel Engberg Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Pqxw95cLNz4JC3 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 7:03=E2=80=AFPM Daniel Engberg = wrote: > > > The referenced commit doesn't define a version so either Example 16 or > possibly Example 19 (some prefer the latter) should be used. > > On top of that, PORTVERSION --> DISTVERSION and GH_TAGNAME should use a > short hash > > Best regards, > Daniel > Yes, I agree. The 'beta' branch seems to have a little in common with the last tag, so probably just appending 20230306 is more correct?