From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 4 08:50:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DEE16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:50:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0D643D48 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:50:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:50:23 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 1A82D5D08; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:50:23 -0700 (PDT) To: "Grover Lines" In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:28:01 PDT." <20040604152801.6CF675D09@ptavv.es.net> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:50:23 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20040604155023.1A82D5D08@ptavv.es.net> cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI Interupt storm detected X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 15:50:39 -0000 Following up my own post, I see that jhb has posted a one line fix to current that fixes the real problem that was previously masked by the error in intr_machdep.c. So leave /sys/i386/i386/intr_machdep.c alone and remove the line: while (cpu_idle_busy > 0) at about line 379 of /sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c. (Or, better yet, see and apply the patch posted to current.) -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634