From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jul 30 14:17:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA07736 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jul 1996 14:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA07716; Tue, 30 Jul 1996 14:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA00621; Tue, 30 Jul 1996 14:16:07 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199607302116.OAA00621@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Union mounts and other mounts To: toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 14:16:07 -0700 (MST) Cc: michaelh@cet.co.jp, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199607251559.KAA00163@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at Jul 25, 96 10:59:19 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Terry, are you out there? > > > > Please upload your mega patches. I'm sure someone will take a look and > > maybe we can at least start with getting the locks fixed. > > > I want to consider including Terry's stuff. Even though I do filesystem > hacking from time to time, I think that we need to get agreement from > other's (on the team) on the changes. The changes have significant > architectural implications. > > At least, in certain areas, Terry is on the right track... We need to > get consensus on the changes. The last batch of changes don't fix all > of the problems, and Jeffery Hsu's stuff should be reviewed and appropriately > included also. I actually think that we are stagnating in this area a "little > bit." But again, I don't feel qualified to make wholesale changes in that > (the VFS) section of the kernel, without agreement from others... Anybody > have any ideas on this impasse? Jeffrey's mount changes are my mount code with some of the edges knocked off... he's done a good job on it. It happens to work around a couple of known problems in the Lite2 code, so he included them. The other changes are less seperable, which is why Poul has asked for a source tree copy (as in previous message: I will try for this weekend). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.