From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 23:29:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CC8106566B for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551E98FC08 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so3246058fxe.17 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.4.136 with SMTP id 8mr1115878far.16.1311290977096; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h10sm1701634fai.43.2011.07.21.16.29.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:29:35 -0700 (PDT) References: <20110721100259.GA5326@external.screwed.box> <80674226c5ead62b213864dcd36b6a75.squirrel@www.magehandbook.com> <20110721153050.GA76083@external.screwed.box> <20110721175420.GF7553@external.screwed.box> <20110721182642.GG7553@external.screwed.box> <321f591217b15bbbb3b936fcfffd6c2f.squirrel@www.magehandbook.com> <4E287271.2050204@cran.org.uk> <20110721194009.GI7553@external.screwed.box> <6F61A3D4-E6CB-41E8-A36C-29A3352776CD@my.gd> <20110721225602.6972e8ac@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20110721225602.6972e8ac@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:29:26 +0200 To: RW Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: build ports from not a root user? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:29:38 -0000 On 21 Jul 2011, at 23:56, RW wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:07:41 +0200 > Damien Fleuriot wrote: >=20 >> On 21 Jul 2011, at 21:40, Peter Vereshagin >> wrote: >=20 >>> Cool. Tried it but couldn't make it to update the only one port, >>> and not to update its dependencies. >>>=20 >>=20 >> That's kinda the point of portupgrade, takes care of the deps for >> you ;) >=20 > portupgrade doesn't upgrade dependencies by default. When it builds a > port, the port installs *missing* dependencies as a side-effect.=20 My point was, that is the reason people like me for instance use portupgrade= or portmanager, recursive upgrades.