From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 20:33:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84B316A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:33:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27E343D1F for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:33:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68196388F83 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:33:53 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:33:53 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <6E4AF352D7C71F78671403BB@utd49554.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <44brb4m5xo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <7592B03796CF6306CA59FEE3@utd49554.utdallas.edu> <44brb4m5xo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: ports libpcap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:33:53 -0000 --On Tuesday, February 01, 2005 02:33:07 PM -0500 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Paul Schmehl writes: > >> I just discovered that there is a port of libpcap. Does anybody know >> if it performs better than the pcap that comes with FreeBSD? > > Why? Are you having problems with it? > No. I was testing ntop and the port offers the option of installing the ports version of libpcap, so I thought I'd ask. > The reason there is a port at all is to support people who might be > looking for more recent features than the version in the tree. > At the moment, I'm not sure there are any significant differences; > speed won't be different, though. Thanks. That's what I was wondering. I read the pkg-message file and the pkg-descr file, so I knew it had additional features, but there was no mention of speed improvements. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu