From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 02:15:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D2C37B401 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 02:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thalia.otenet.gr (thalia.otenet.gr [195.170.0.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811FC43FBF for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 02:15:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b189.otenet.gr [212.205.244.197]) by thalia.otenet.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h399FUmP017513; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:15:31 +0300 (EEST) Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h399FTUi095268; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:15:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h399FR1J095267; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:15:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:15:27 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: jonr@destar.net Message-ID: <20030409091527.GA94871@gothmog.gr> References: <1049817201.1588.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20030409034713.GC650@gothmog.gr> <1438.192.168.1.1.1049864071.squirrel@www.destar.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438.192.168.1.1.1049864071.squirrel@www.destar.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbufs exhausted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 09:15:45 -0000 On 2003-04-08 20:54, jonr@destar.net wrote: > I did as you suggested and both nmbclusters and nmbufs were maxed out, > well nmbclusters was about 3 clusters shy of maxxing out. I went into > my /boot/defaults/loader.conf and changed the nmbclusters to =4096 and > rebooted. Should this setting have been added to the kernel and > recompiled or is setting it in the loader.conf alright also? Should be fine... there's very little difference (if any) between setting tunables through the loader and compiling them into the kernel image that you boot. - Giorgos