From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 21 11:20:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FC037B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:20:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A27843E42 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:20:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24206; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:20:08 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDD31E8.5040208@owt.com> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:20:08 -0800 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Roger Merritt , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Portsupgrade -uU References: <5.2.0.9.0.20021121132627.00a0e670@127.0.0.1> <20021121082130.GA17172@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:28:45PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote: > >>At 02:04 AM 11/21/02, you wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote: >>> >>>>When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below. How can I fix >>> >>>these >>> >>>>malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies? >>>>Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine. >>> >>>If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port >>>maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the >>>output are just warnings (intended for maintainers). >> > > INDEX builds shouldn't have any warnings if you perform them in a > clean environment. Either your ports collection is out of date > (i.e. in an inconsistent state) or the index build is picking up > things from the host environment like installed ports, > WITH_*/WITHOUT_* variables, etc. If the latter, it's a bug in > portupgrade..someone should investigate and report it to the author. I thought that I have a clean environment. There are no WITH_*/WITHOU_* variables in my /etc/make.conf. I just finished doing a "portupgrade -aufp" and still get them. About the only time I don't see them, is right before a release and you are building iso's. The messages are real. For example, I see messages like p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete and the INDEX that is built has no r-deps. The Makefile sets r-deps to RUN_DEPENDS= ${BUILD_DEPENDS} but I have a b-deps with entries and a "R-deps:" with no entry. One thing I have noticed is that most of them have a "PKGNAMEPREFIX= p5-" syntax. I have thought about hiding them but considered that similar to redirecting my "buildworld to > /dev/null" and then doing an installworld. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message