From owner-svn-src-user@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 21 10:22:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B51C183; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.64.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996B48FC08; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9LALtV1068241; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:21:55 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9LALtn8068240; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:21:55 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:21:55 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Andre Oppermann Subject: Re: svn commit: r241798 - in user/andre/tcp_workqueue/sys: kern sys Message-ID: <20121021102155.GA64905@FreeBSD.org> References: <201210210846.q9L8kGX7029653@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201210210846.q9L8kGX7029653@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the experimental " user" src tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:22:04 -0000 On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:46:16AM +0000, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> Author: andre A> Date: Sun Oct 21 08:46:15 2012 A> New Revision: 241798 A> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241798 A> A> Log: A> Make sure that global locks have their own CPU cache line in A> the .bss section of the kernel and do not end up sharing one A> by chance or the place they are defined in. A> A> Three new macros are added: A> MTX_GLOBAL(name) defining the mutex A> MTX_GLOBAL_STATIC(name) defining the mutex as static A> MTX_GLB(name) accessing the mutex in mtx_lock() A> A> This makes global locks cache deterministic. Changes to the A> .bss layout and ordering due to differences in completely A> unrelated parts of the kernel can no longer cause global A> locks to share the same CPU cache line. A> A> This is a proof of concept with only one global lock converted. A> A> I'm open to suggestions and improvements on the macros and A> their naming. My fault, I have confused you yesterday in our discussion. Actually we don't need to embrace declaration into additional struct. This code works: static struct mtx __aligned(CACHE_LINE_SIZE) foo_mtx; When speaking about embracing, I actually meant that we can embrace into anonymous struct a mutex and a structures it protects, not a mutex only. P.S. Before merging such changes to head we need to do some benchmarking proving that this isn't a nop. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.