From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 22:11:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB1D16A41F for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:11:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from russell@russellmeek.net) Received: from a.mx.russellmeek.net (91.59.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com [70.118.59.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322B943D45 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:11:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from russell@russellmeek.net) Received: (qmail 60517 invoked by uid 89); 23 Nov 2005 22:11:06 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 59270, pid: 59713, t: 0.5174s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.87.1/m:34/d:1188 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on prometheus.russellmeek.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.8.104?) (russell@russellmeek.net@64.212.109.78) by a.mx.russellmeek.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Nov 2005 22:11:06 -0000 Message-ID: <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:11:02 -0500 From: Russell Meek User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:11:08 -0000 Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server enviroment, production or non? Pros? Cons? Thanks, Russell