From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  2 20:36:07 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DDD0884
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jul 2014 20:36:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258ED2EC0
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jul 2014 20:36:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1X2RG7-000Axq-77; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:36:03 +0400
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 00:36:03 +0400
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD iscsi target
Message-ID: <20140702203603.GO5102@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <20140626232727.GB1825@pwnie.vrt.sourcefire.com>
 <53ACE5B4.8070700@rice.edu>
 <CAPjTQNEsQGDHdApx0-=h63QN4o=zXKen0Y_6Ehj9_isfgac9tw@mail.gmail.com>
 <F2BBBB6E0068844991318A316F34795C390447@nice.asicdesigners.com>
 <20140701091252.GB3443@brick> <20140701231305.GA37246@zxy.spb.ru>
 <CAN6yY1t2qDzfeO37p2s_3=vzEVv5C813M0ttqjnM4tJGkkBhyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140702112609.GA85758@zxy.spb.ru>
 <CAN6yY1uzfjoDfEdti91Ogy11LzT3-5JvLREBdW6ynEOgm0uUPA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1uzfjoDfEdti91Ogy11LzT3-5JvLREBdW6ynEOgm0uUPA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: Sreenivasa Honnur <shonnur@chelsio.com>,
 FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:36:07 -0000

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:51:59PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:43:08PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:12:52AM +0200, Edward Tomasz Napierala
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi.  I've replied in private, but just for the record:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 0627T0927, Sreenivasa Honnur wrote:
> > > > > > Does freebsd iscsi target supports:
> > > > > > 1. ACL (access control lists)
> > > > >
> > > > > In 10-STABLE there is a way to control access based on initiator
> > > > > name and IP address.
> > > > >
> > > > > > 2. iSNS
> > > > >
> > > > > No; it's one of the iSCSI features that seem to only be used
> > > > > for marketing purposes :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > > 3. Multiple connections per session
> > > > >
> > > > > No; see above.
> > > >
> > > > I think this is help for 40G links.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I assume that you are looking at transfer of large amounts of data over
> > 40G
> > > links. Assuming that tis is the case, yes, multiple connections per
> > session
> >
> > Yes, this case. As I know, single transfer over 40G link limited by
> > 10G.
> >
> ??? No, not at all. Getting 40G performance over TCP is not easy, but there
> is no 10G limitation.

As I know (may be wrong) 40G is bundled 4x10G link.
For prevent packet reordering (when run over diferrent link) all
packets from one sessoin must be routed to same link.
Same issuse for Etherchannel.