From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 25 08:40:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC4F106567C for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8C38FC1A for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5P8e4V6038384 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5P8e4IM038383; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:40:04 GMT Message-Id: <201206250840.q5P8e4IM038383@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org From: Adrian Chadd Cc: Subject: Re: kern/169199: [ath] Cannot set up static ip addresses for wireless with wpa encryption X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Adrian Chadd List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:40:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/169199; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Adrian Chadd To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, donaldcallen@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/169199: [ath] Cannot set up static ip addresses for wireless with wpa encryption Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:37:39 -0700 Hi, This sounds like an installer problem. Have you created PRs for all the other installer issues that you were seeing? I use static and DHCP IPs on a variety of atheros NICs on -8, -9 and -10. I've had no problems. If you don't mind, I'll file this over to whoever looks after the installer PRs for them to look at. it may have been fixed after 9.0-RELEASE was made and thus a 9-STABLE snapshot would work better. Thanks, Adrian