From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 25 00:05:00 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73BD16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:05:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FED443D1D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:05:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5827E514FE; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:04:59 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: /dev/null <null@dnswatch.com>
Message-ID: <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20050424175543.71041.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com>
	<20050424151517.O68772@lexi.siliconlandmark.com>
	<3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:05:01 -0000


--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:29:30PM -0700, /dev/null wrote:

> needed. All in all life on 5.x and the "upgrade" wasn't too bad. I will
> say that there is ONE issue that I have found and have not yet solved. It
> now takes at least 2 times longer to build any of the ports.

This is not a FreeBSD performance bug.  FreeBSD 5.x uses gcc 3.x,
which takes longer to compile code than gcc 2.x because it does much
more optimization.

> Performance in other areas seems to be lagging as well.

Since you were wrong about the above, I have to ask whether you have
evidence of this.

Kris
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCbDQqWry0BWjoQKURAoEDAKDsecGoOo5l4C4qNMFbueeiwKjGjwCfenPd
5NneMcPzbhx3AgKALVleld4=
=pQcq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--