Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:34:17 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Darrel <levitch@iglou.com>, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc Message-ID: <44ehmiyhfa.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031309580.6464@shell1> (Darrel's message of "Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:13:41 -0400 (EDT)") References: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031147260.6464@shell1> <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031309580.6464@shell1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Darrel <levitch@iglou.com> writes: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> >>> On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>>> I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as >>>> opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used >>>> with subversion. >>> >>> stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 >> >> Ah, yes, that makes sense. I hadn't looked higher than the releng part >> of the path. >> >> Is anyone working on documenting this for the "cutting edge" section of >> the Handbook? I could take a shot at it myself, but I likely couldn't >> produce anything intelligible for beginners (at least, not before 9.1 is >> out). >> > > If you do decide to write a new section, I could possibly offer help > on "dumbing it down". :) At least with the English version. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171292 I don't think "dumbing it down" is an issue. What I may have left out that beginners wouldn't think of... more of a concern.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ehmiyhfa.fsf>