From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jul 1 7:40:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD6A37B400; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 07:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3A043E09; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 07:40:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.cc) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (madman.nectar.cc [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BF034; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:40:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g61Eeh4N006826; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:40:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@madman.nectar.cc) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g61EehoI006825; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:40:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:40:43 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, dinoex@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re[2]: openssh OR openssh-portable Message-ID: <20020701144043.GQ4764@madman.nectar.cc> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, dinoex@FreeBSD.org References: <3D1AD7C4.9020909@cerint.pl> <41256714305.20020627163946@datafull.com> <20020701143038.GM4764@madman.nectar.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: > > Of course, OpenSSH 3.4 is always available via the Ports Collection, > > and I would, in fact, recommend that users take advantage of it and > > turn on PrivilegeSeperation if at all possible. > > I wouldn't - the port needs quite a bit of work and is too much of a > moving target right now :( I'll have us agree by defining `if at all possible' to include a stable, working OpenSSH port :-) I'm sure Dirk is ready and willing to fix any problems that crop up. I think that the port currently provides the functionality needed by a large cross-section of users. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message