From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 8 16:02:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB3F16A420 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 16:02:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wfe.dehaan@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB5F43D69 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 16:02:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wfe.dehaan@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m3so422062ugc for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 08:02:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=baKvv/cjNOrHyA76J3KHUJPM+WRUWh/p0vIUCtOyz6rMUIrdOLGvYuTXHAEKGCT0Dz6pXefRB96Fu39hHPavmopGIwXEg7bYxNROz40/7ake7XR4s1r9geuLXGZKtl4dTkddhcXpQDvPA+2H+MKwyVutAvozxC0XCxHZ+MKqk1M= Received: by 10.66.221.11 with SMTP id t11mr3726354ugg; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 08:02:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.21.20 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 08:02:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:02:44 +0100 From: Ernst de Haan Sender: wfe.dehaan@gmail.com To: Justen Stepka In-Reply-To: <43EA11F6.1000204@jstepka.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43EA11F6.1000204@jstepka.name> Cc: FreeBSD-Java Subject: Re: performance issues with JDK X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ernst de Haan List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:02:50 -0000 Justen, > The problem I have is that my Windows 2003 server environment where I am > doing much testing of several of the applications is running MUCH faster > than the dedicated FBSD host. Is there some type of tuning option that I > could enable to get the system to run faster? > > If additional information is needed, I would be more than happy to > supply this data. What hardware does the Windows 2003 machine have? Could you run a basic test to determine the difference in performance? Please submit both the test code and the results. Ernst